The Nigerian government’s decision to ban the production of alcoholic drinks in sachets and small bottles has sparked mixed reactions across the country. The initiative, first proposed in 2018, aims to address the public health issues associated with cheap and easily accessible alcohol.
In 2018, a memorandum of understanding (MoU) was signed by the Federal Ministry of Health, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC), the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC), and industry bodies like the Association of Food, Beverages and Tobacco Employers (AFBTE) to gradually phase out these products over five years.
Despite initial resistance and multiple delays, the Senate, on November 5, mandated NAFDAC to adhere to the December 31 deadline for implementing the ban. This directive followed an urgent motion by Senator Asuquo Ekpenyong, who emphasized the need to align with global standards to reduce alcohol-related harm.
Senator Ekpenyong highlighted the dangers posed by sachet alcohol, including addiction, impaired cognitive development, and increased road accidents. He noted that manufacturers lobbying for further extensions undermine regulatory authority and public health.
Supporting the motion, Senator Anthony Ani described the situation as a growing social menace, calling for immediate action to protect younger generations.
Senate President Godswill Akpabio endorsed the resolution, urging NAFDAC to enforce the ban by December 2025, emphasizing its importance for public health and youth welfare.
NAFDAC’s Director-General, Prof. Mojisola Adeyeye, reiterated the agency’s commitment to enforcing the ban, backed by the Senate and the Federal Ministry of Health. Adeyeye stated that the ban is protective, not punitive, and aims to safeguard the health of the nation.
The ban targets only spirit drinks in sachets and small bottles below 200ml. Stakeholders are urged to comply with the deadline as no further extensions will be considered.
While some Nigerians view the ban as necessary for public health, manufacturers and vendors express concerns about its impact on their businesses. Mrs. Bukola Jaiyeloba, a vendor, argued that the ban would affect her livelihood and limit access for the less affluent.
Consumers, particularly those frequenting spots like Mile 2 in Lagos, lament the potential loss of affordable pleasure, questioning why the government is targeting alcohol while other harmful substances remain prevalent.
The government’s position remains firm, prioritizing public health over economic interests, despite the mixed reactions.
